![]() Postman sometimes has difficulties when working with a custom proxy, while Insomnia works great in these kind of situations. Even though Postman is suitable in almost any case, there are some situations where Postman might not be the best match as an API testing tool e.g. This results in Insomnia being suitable for not as many cases as Postman, but instead it gives you a better user experience. Postman focuses more on having almost every possible feature into their tool, whereas Insomnia focuses more on just being an HTTP client with some additional features to be able to work more productive. All these features are offered in a free version, but there’s also a licensed version with more functionalities when working in teams.Ĭompared to Insomnia, Postman is a more mature tool and has a much bigger community. generating timestamps, transforming strings, …), request-chaining, response history, code snippet generation in 12 different languages, working with proxies, JSON filtering on the responses, and many more …. Other nice features are the template tags (which are more like operations you can call, e.g. You can structure all you tests by creating a hierarchy of different environments with separated variables which can be easily referenced by autocompletion anywhere within the tool. It contains all basic features to test REST API’s like creating HTTP requests with the possibility to add headers and authentication or grabbing the response and view the status, body, headers and cookies. It is a powerful cross-platform REST API client which is very easy to use and has a well thought-out and user-friendly UI. Insomnia is one of those lesser known API tools. SoapUI, Postman and Rest-Assured are the most popular ones, but there are many other tools, each with their own features and specifications. ![]() There are lots of API testing tools available on the market, some of them are free, others require a license. API testing is much faster and more reliable than UI-based tests, thus more appropriate to receive fast feedback. So, using these UI tests in continuous builds might not be the most appropriate approach to receive fast feedback. UI tests tend to run horribly slow, are brittle and hard to maintain. It increased the application’s release frequency, which demands for new ways to receive fast feedback on the quality to these releases. As agile development is becoming the standard in most organizations, if influences the way we develop software and automate tests. ![]() The main reason for this shift to API testing is, off course, the Internet of Things, but also agile development has had a big influence. Nowadays API testing is becoming more and more important.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |